Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a client-centered, goal-oriented counseling approach that helps individuals explore and resolve ambivalence about behavior change. By fostering empathy, collaboration, and autonomy, MI empowers clients to find their own motivation for change, utilizing techniques like open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarizing (OARS).
Get Started with Advaita Health!
What is Motivational Interviewing?
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a client-centered, goal-oriented counseling method designed to facilitate behavior change by helping individuals explore and resolve ambivalence (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). Rather than imposing change, MI empowers clients to discover their intrinsic motivation and voice their own reasons for making meaningful changes. Built on a foundation of empathy, collaboration, and respect for autonomy, MI uses techniques such as open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarizing—known collectively as OARS (SAMHSA, 2019).
MI operates through four interwoven processes: Engaging (establishing a working relationship), Focusing (setting an agenda for change), Evoking (eliciting client motivations), and Planning (developing actionable steps toward change) (Miller & Rollnick, 2013; SAMHSA, 2019). This approach is particularly effective when clients are in the early stages of contemplating change, as it helps guide them from ambivalence to action by fostering “change talk” and reducing “sustain talk.”
What are the Four Processes of Motivational Interviewing?
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a counseling method that emphasizes the client’s autonomy while promoting behavior change through a non-confrontational approach. By encouraging individuals to resolve ambivalence, MI empowers clients to explore their motivations for change, instead of having external pressure applied to make that change. MI is grounded in core principles of empathy, collaboration, and respect for the client’s autonomy. The key techniques include open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarizing (known as OARS) (SAMHSA, 2019).
MI involves four primary processes:
- Engaging: Building rapport and trust with the client.
- Focusing: Setting clear goals for the change process.
- Evoking: Eliciting the client’s internal motivations for change.
- Planning: Creating actionable steps to achieve the desired change (Miller & Rollnick, 2013; SAMHSA, 2019).
By guiding clients through these processes, MI helps individuals move from ambivalence to meaningful behavior change.
What are the Origins of Motivational Interviewing?
Motivational Interviewing (MI) was introduced by William R. Miller in 1983 as a method for treating alcohol use disorder. Collaborating with Stephen Rollnick, Miller expanded the approach into a formalized method, blending elements of Carl Rogers’ client-centered therapy with behavior change strategies. The foundational text, Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (2013), encapsulates the evolution of MI, drawing on decades of clinical research and application.
Initially created to address alcohol use, MI has since expanded to address a variety of behavioral issues, such as smoking cessation, medication adherence, diet and exercise, and mental health concerns like anxiety and depression. A recent evolution, Collective Motivational Interviewing (CMI), adapts MI by including the client’s social network—significant others, families, and peer groups—in the motivational process (Tse et al., 2023).
The Role of Motivational Interviewing in Substance Use Treatment
Motivational Interviewing (MI) has become a key approach in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, particularly for clients who may not be ready for change or who exhibit ambivalence toward treatment. MI is most effective during the early stages of behavior change, helping clients resolve ambivalence and move toward action. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), MI is essential in engaging clients during the early phases of SUD interventions (SAMHSA, 2019).
Research supports MI’s effectiveness in enhancing treatment engagement and retention. A Cochrane review by Smedslund et al. (2011) found MI significantly reduces substance use compared to no treatment, particularly in short-term follow-ups. MI has also been shown to improve readiness for change, with some evidence suggesting it can boost retention in treatment. However, long-term outcomes still require further study.
What is Collective Motivational Interviewing? Cultural and Social Extensions
While traditional MI emphasizes personal autonomy and individualized goals, new adaptations like Collective Motivational Interviewing (CMI) are broadening the scope of MI by involving the client’s social network in the motivational process (Tse et al., 2023). CMI is built on the idea that addiction is not only an individual problem, but also a social one. By including significant others (CSOs), family members, and peer groups, CMI creates “shared interpersonal cognitive dissonance” that can strengthen motivation for change.
This model is especially useful in collectivist cultures, where family and community involvement are critical to decision-making and well-being. Interventions using CMI have shown promising outcomes, including increased motivation, improved family engagement, and better treatment adherence. However, it’s important that CSOs are properly prepared and selected to ensure their involvement supports, rather than hinders, the client’s recovery (Tse et al., 2023).
MI vs. Traditional Confrontational Approaches
If I asked you to imagine an intervention, you’d quickly conjure up a scene of a group of people in a circle dramatically telling a loved one how their substance use has hurt them. You’d likely imagine that scene ending with some sort of ultimatums about choosing to go to rehab in that moment or being cut off from everyone.
Historically, substance use treatment often relied on confrontational tactics, such as challenging resistance and urging compliance. While these methods can sometimes produce immediate behavioral compliance, they can also lead to defensiveness, shame, and dropout. In contrast, Motivational Interviewing (MI) fosters empathy and collaboration, helping clients resolve ambivalence without coercion.
MI emphasizes motivational enhancement, rather than external pressure. Unlike methods like contingency management, which offer tangible rewards for behavior change, MI aims to uncover the client’s internal reasons for change—motivations that are more sustainable over time (SAMHSA, 2019).
A Cochrane review confirmed MI’s superiority over no treatment and found it comparable to other active treatments in reducing substance use in the short term (Smedslund et al., 2011). MI’s focus on self-efficacy and respect strengthens the therapeutic alliance, which is crucial for positive outcomes across a variety of therapeutic approaches.
Conclusion: Continuing the Evolution of MI
Motivational Interviewing is a dynamic, evidence-based approach that continues to evolve in response to the complexities of human behavior and cultural diversity. From its origins in alcohol treatment to its current applications in treating co-occurring disorders and involving family and social networks, MI is a powerful alternative to confrontational methods. Its emphasis on empathy, autonomy, and collaboration promotes sustained behavior change and humanizes the therapeutic process. As the field progresses, ongoing research and innovation will be essential to adapting MI for diverse populations and new behavioral health challenges.
Summary of Motivational Interviewing (MI):
- Client-centered and goal-oriented: MI empowers individuals to find their own intrinsic motivation for change, focusing on autonomy and collaboration.
- Ambivalence resolution: MI helps clients explore and resolve ambivalence toward change, guiding them from uncertainty to action.
- Core techniques (OARS): Open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarizing are key methods used to facilitate the process.
- Four key processes: Engaging (building rapport), Focusing (setting goals), Evoking (eliciting motivations), and Planning (creating actionable steps) are the steps MI uses to support behavior change.
- Adaptable: MI is effective across a range of issues, from substance use and mental health concerns to smoking cessation and diet changes.
- Evidence-based: Research has shown MI is highly effective, especially in early stages of change, and promotes long-term behavior change through internal motivation rather than external pressure.
Join Our Free Virtual Family Group
At Advaita Integrative Medicine, we provide a Free Weekly Virtual Family Support Group designed to empower families with tools and strategies to support their loved ones through substance use challenges. Using a blend of the Invitation to Change Model, CRAFT, and Motivational Interviewing techniques, our group offers practical guidance and emotional support. If you’re looking for help and guidance on how to support a family member, simply fill out the form below, and we’ll be in touch to get you started. to recovery.
Written By: Deana Luciano, Ph.D, LCMHC-A, LCAS, MCAP, NCC
Get Started with Advaita Health!
References
Buckner, J. D. (2024). Motivational interviewing-based interventions with patients with comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders. Current Opinion in Psychology, 60, 101934. Available Here.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
SAMHSA. (2019). Using motivational interviewing in substance use disorder treatment: Advisory. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available Here.
Smedslund, G., Berg, R. C., Hammerstrøm, K. T., Steiro, A., Leiknes, K. A., Dahl, H. M., & Karlsen, K. (2011). Motivational interviewing for substance abuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(5), CD008063. Available Here.
Tse, N., Tse, S., Wong, P., & Adams, P. (2023). Collective motivational interviewing for substance use problems: Concept and implications. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21, 2538–2555. Available Here.
Smedslund, G., Berg, R. C., Hammerstrøm, K. T., Steiro, A., Leiknes, K. A., Dahl, H. M., & Karlsen, K. (2023). Motivational interviewing for substance use disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023(4), CD008063. Available Here.
